"If there really exist ultimate units, we have only to discover their laws and all their possible combinations, and we shall be all-knowing and all-powerful, like gods" a quote from Lancelot Whyte (Essay on Atomism: from Democritus to 1960). Lancelot predicted that a renewed atomism likely would become the ulitmate theory of the depth of reality.
Through history atomism has been ignored and surpressed and even outlawed. Plato supposedly wanted to burn as many of Democritus books as possible, but why? An anonymous cleric supposedly filed a report with the Inquisition in which he claimed to show that Galileo was an atomist. In 1624 the Paris Parliament decreed that a person maintaining or teaching atomism would be liable to death penalty. "The aggressive rise of physical atomism as an adequate explanation of the universe... provoked a crusade (1660-1700) against it." Lancelot Whyte.
Have you ever met a modern physicst well studied in atomism. I strongly doubt so!
The postulates from ancient atomism surprisingly leads to the same mathematical end results as given by Einstein's special relativity theory, but atomism leads also to a series of additional results. Atomism also gives us a very different interpretation than special relativity theory. Einstein said nothing about what energy and matter consist of.
"It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is." Richard Feynman
For links to finance see the bottom of this page.
Unified Revolution introduces a new fundamental theory of physics, backed up by mathematics and scientific experiments. For the first time in the history of man, a unified theory of space, time, energy, mass, gravity, causality, uncertainty, cosmology, and even memory and intelligence is presented.
More than 2,500 years ago, the ancient Greek philosophers, Democritus and Leucippus, assumed that everything consisted solely of indivisible particles perpetually traveling in the void. This theory was called atomism. Ancient atomism was abandoned and ignored by modern science, not because the theory was flawed, but because it was never understood, and not even close to fully explored. This book introduces a new mathematical framework derived from ancient atomism, and it therefore includes several hundred new mathematical results in fundamental physics that have never been published before.
Einstein's special theory of relativity only scratches the surface of space and time, and it is replaced through this work by indivisible relativity theory. Einstein s famous formula, E=Mc^2 , is correct, but there are several deeper layers behind this formula that are revealed in this book. Unified Revolution will cause shock waves in the scientific community.
ISBN 978-82-999703-0-3: Hardcover (only), 752 pages, more than 200 colour illustrations. Cover design Line Halsnes.
www.amazon.com , Tronsmo.no (Oslo's best bookstore, just in front of the Kings Castle, that I used to guard)
Follow me also on my blog where I will be actively discussing Unified Revolution and its many implications. I recently also signed up on twitter, you will find me as @EGHaug.
Table of Contents and Preface
Table summary of main differences between atomism and main frame physics
Comments and corrections version 8 November 2015
My presentation at the 14-10 club at the Royal Institution, London, October 15, 2015. Expect a slow download as the file is about 140mb. The presentation is not easy to understand only from the slides. I am open for more talks about this topic! My talk was mainly about mathematical atomism, which is what my new theory and book are about. The first few slides was about high speed trading under special relativity theory. Here the conclusions are correct if comparing a midpoint colocation with a single exchange colocation. However there is a third type of set-up, twin (or mirror) exchange colocation, and in that case some of the conclusions on some of the slides do not hold. See my midpoint colocation page for many more details on this!
Explanation: true one-way speed of light
Excel spreadsheets (directly linked to physics derived from ancient atomism):
There is much more to the speed of light, length contraction and time dilation than any book on special relativity theory will tell you about. Special relativity theory is an incomplete theory that need to be replaced with indivisible relativity theory derived from the postulates of ancient atomism! Of course not because it is derived from these ancient postulates, but because it also can explain results that SR cannot explain, like a series of ignored one-way speed of light experiments. Ancient atomism dressed up in modern mathematics is the simplest theory possible that is still is able to explain the world we observe around us.
One-way speed of light any direction alpha, One-way speed of light any direction theta, One-way speed of light parallel direction
The Einstein synchronization error.
The relationship between alpha and theta
Round-trip speed of light.
Two-way speed: in the special relativity theory literature better known as: mutual speed, exterior relative speed, or closing speed.
Length contraction and expansion in the parallel direction In general one cannot (even hypothetically) measure length contraction without having two synchronized clocks. Einstein length contraction contains a synchronization error. It is the Einstein synchronization error that makes the Einstein length contraction reciprocal. Under Einstein's theory two trains traveling in the opposite direction will both claim it is the other train that is contracted. This holds true when using Einstein synchronized clocks. However, the length contraction in Einstein's theory is an apparent length contraction that has an embedded Einstein synchronization error. The FitzGerald length contraction (and also the original Lorentz contraction) are not the same as the Einstein contraction. In FitzGerald length contraction it is the velocity relative to the ether that is relevant. Under Einstein's theory it is only the relative velocity that counts. FitzGerald's contraction and also the original Lorentz contraction are incomplete (they only holds between the ether frame and one moving frame, not between two frames that both move against the ether frame) and the Einstein length contraction contains a synchronization error. See my book for derivations and discussions. Length contraction/expansion for any angle relative to the void.
Time dilation: the true one-way time dilation is not isotropic and not reciprocal. One-way time dilation as measured with Einstein synchronized clocks (also under atomism) is isotropic and reciprocal.
The symbols used in the illustration below should not be confused with the use of some of the same symbols in modern phyics.
New Fundamental Physics
Below I have listed some of my recent papers and working papers. They are not necessary related to the atomist theory in my book. Comments and (constructive) critics are welcome! In particular I find the similarity between Planck units re-written in the form given in some of my papers below and the ones derived directly from atomism are very interesting. Energy and mass and their deeper relationships can in my view truly be understood only when derived directly from atomism as shown in my book.
April 2017: The Mass Gap, Kg, the Planck Constant and the Gravity Gap
March 2017: The Ultimate Limits of the Relativistic Rocket Equation. The Planck Photon Rocket Acta Astronautica, Volume 136, July 2017
April 2017: Двигатели Бога
April 2017: The fun world of theoretical physics frees us all from the shackles of reality and helps set our imaginations free to ponder Popular science Coverage in global futrism
March 2017: We May Be Able to Build a Rocket That Can Go 99.999% the Speed of Light Popular science Coverage in Futurism
March 2017: Photon Rockets Might Make Mars A Three Minute Trip Coverage in Forbes
Feb 2017: Can the Planck Length be Found Independent of Big G ?
Feb 2017: A Maximum Limit on Proper Velocity
Jan 2017: A Suggested Boundary for Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle
Jan 2017: Einstein versus FitzGerald, Lorentz, and Larmor Length Contraction
Dec 2016: Deriving the Maximum Velocity of Matter from the Planck Length Limit on Length Contraction
Dec 2016: Reductio ad Absurdum: Modern Physics’ Incomplete Absurd Relativistic Mass Interpretation. And the Simple Solution that Saves Einstein’s Formula.
Nov 2016: The gravitational constant and the Planck units. A simplification of the quantum realm Physics essays, Vol 29. No. 4. This paper show the Newton gravitaional constant likely is a Universal composite constant that again is a function of more fundamental constants, it also shortly discuss my newly introduced maximum velocity for all subatomic particles that potentilly can be used to find the Planck lenght independent of G. This published version contains much more information than a previous working paper draft I put out on vixra.
Nov 2016: The Planck Mass Must Always Have Zero Momentum Relativistic Energy-Momentum Relationship for the Planck Mass. As remarkably as it seems this must be the case. Please study carefully my paper on the Planck mass particle first! That the Planck mass must stand still as observed from any reference frame is simply revolutionary!
Nov 2016: Escape Velocity at the Subatomic Level Leads to Escape Probability
Oct 2016: Newton and Einstein's Gravity in a New Perspective for Planck Masses and Smaller Sized Objects
Oct 2016: Planets and Suns and Their Corresponding Sphere Packed Average Particles
Sep 2016: The Lorentz Transformation at the Maximum Velocity for a Mass
Sep 2016: A New Solution to Einstein's Relativistic Mass Challenge Based on Maximum Frequency
Excel sheet to calculate the maximum speed of some "fundamnetal" particles
July 2016: A Subatomic Replica of Our Solar System. Macrocosmos and Microcosmos. As Above! So Below!
July 2016: The Planck Mass Particle Finally Discovered! The True God Particle! Good bye to the Point Particle Hypothesis! This paper is directly related to the atomism theory in my book. It seems like atomism is consistent with for example the Heisenberg's Uncertainity formula, but with a new interpretation. It also gives a new and logical interpretation for the Schwarzschild radius at the Planck scale. There are no miniblack-holes. The math has been hinting us towards a unique indvisible particle always moving at the speed of light. Atomism show us there is a speed limit just before the speed of light when mass must turn into energy. These speed limtis are far above what is currently achived at LHC.
The Schwarzshild radius at the Planck scale has a very simple explenation under atomism:
Under atomism the Heisenberg Uncertanity Principle has a very simple explenation at the Planck scale: (see the paper above for more information on this)
July 2016: A Highly Speculative Note on How to Modify Einstein’s Field Equation to Hold at the Quantum Scale. Gravity = Strong force at the quantum scale?
July 2016: Is the Schwarzschild Radius Truly a Radius?
July 2016: Planck Dimensional Analysis of Big G
June 2016: Planck Quantization of Newton and Einstein Gravitation, International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6, 206-217
Illustration by Line Halsnes based on childish draft by the author.
May 2016: The Return of Absolute Simultaneity and Its Relationship to Einstein’s Relativity of Simultaneity. This paper is strongly linked to atomism. To fully understand it read my book first.
April 2016: Charged Particle Radiation Power at the Planck Scale
April 2016: Unification of Gravity and Electromagnetism: GravityElectroMagnetism: A Probability Interpretation of Gravity This seems to make lots of sense from atomism point of view, study atomism first and you will possibly see the light?
April 2016: A Note on The Dimensionless Gravitational Coupling Constant This way of re-writing the so called dimensionless gravitational coupling constant could be essencial to truly understand gravity, see the paper above.
April 2016: The Collapse of the Schwarzschild Radius: The End of Black Holes?
April 2016: A Note on The Reduced Mass
March 2016: The Gravitational Constant and the Planck's Units: A Simplification of the Quantum Realm
Excel spredsheet showing the simplified notation give the same answer as "standard" less intuitive notation.
Take a look at the simplified Planck units, notice no longer c^3.5, c^4.5 etc. Please tell me the intuition of c^4.5, reductionism and simplification can be useful.
March 2016: Squaring the Circle and Doubling the Cube
Finance and economics:
Books, Articles, Collector comic and animation, Features, High Speed Trading
@ Copyright: from infinity to infinity, Espen Gaarder Haug